PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XAGH.TO is traded in CAD, while FXNAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FXNAX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGH.TO achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than FXNAX's 1.27% return.


XAGH.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.11%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-0.86%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
10Y*

FXNAX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.10%
YTD
1.27%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-0.57%5.24%0.01%4.10%-13.03%0.15%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
1.27%2.23%10.06%3.49%-7.39%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGH.TO and FXNAX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.37

The correlation between XAGH.TO and FXNAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAGH.TO
XAGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XAGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAGH.TOFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.46

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

3.46

-0.61

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAGH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAGH.TO and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAGH.TOFXNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.16

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.54

-0.76

Drawdowns

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGH.TO and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAGH.TOFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-20.86%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-4.37%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.03%

-6.89%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-2.77%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-6.72%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.84%

-0.73%

Volatility

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) at 1.30%. This indicates that XAGH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAGH.TOFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.30%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

4.24%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

5.52%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.95%

7.91%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.95%

7.85%

+0.10%

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGH.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XAGH.TO vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

XAGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than FXNAX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.71%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
4.01%3.78%3.51%3.05%1.91%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAGH.TO and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAGH.TO and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer