FSHBX vs. SCHO
FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both funds - FSHBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX returned 2.09%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for SCHO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSHBX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.
Performance
FSHBX vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than SCHO's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX has outperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 2.09%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.
FSHBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
SCHO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 3.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.84%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
FSHBX vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 0.32% | 5.49% | 4.73% | 5.35% | -3.86% | -0.92% | 3.59% | 4.20% | 1.21% | 1.16% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.42% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | -3.87% | -0.64% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 1.37% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHBX and SCHO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FSHBX and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSHBX vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank
FSHBX
SCHO
FSHBX vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSHBX | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.61 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 15.06 | -4.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSHBX vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and SCHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHBX | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -5.69% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -0.86% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | -0.98% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.36% | -5.69% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.51% | -5.69% | -0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.27% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -0.61% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.21% | +0.10% |
Volatility
FSHBX vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.49%. This indicates that FSHBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSHBX | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 0.49% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | 0.98% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 1.40% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 1.99% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.86% | 1.56% | +0.30% |
FSHBX vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSHBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSHBX vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than SCHO's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 4.18% | 4.26% | 4.00% | 3.00% | 0.83% | 1.04% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.27% | 1.12% | 0.88% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSHBX and SCHO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSHBX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to SCHO (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHBX dropped -8.80% vs SCHO's -5.69%.
SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSHBX and SCHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer