XAGH.TO vs. VAB.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO).
XAGH.TO and VAB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XAGH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl Core Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Aug 6, 2021. VAB.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Canadian Float Adjusted Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. Both XAGH.TO and VAB.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XAGH.TO or VAB.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XAGH.TO and VAB.TO is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XAGH.TO vs. VAB.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XAGH.TO:
0.64
VAB.TO:
1.28
XAGH.TO:
0.98
VAB.TO:
1.91
XAGH.TO:
1.13
VAB.TO:
1.22
XAGH.TO:
0.25
VAB.TO:
0.59
XAGH.TO:
1.50
VAB.TO:
5.78
XAGH.TO:
2.39%
VAB.TO:
1.28%
XAGH.TO:
5.59%
VAB.TO:
5.78%
XAGH.TO:
-18.26%
VAB.TO:
-18.39%
XAGH.TO:
-9.68%
VAB.TO:
-4.83%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAGH.TO achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than VAB.TO's 0.84% return.
XAGH.TO
1.26%
1.22%
-1.64%
3.61%
N/A
N/A
VAB.TO
0.84%
1.32%
1.83%
7.28%
0.09%
1.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XAGH.TO vs. VAB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAGH.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VAB.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XAGH.TO vs. VAB.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XAGH.TO
VAB.TO
XAGH.TO vs. VAB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XAGH.TO vs. VAB.TO - Dividend Comparison
XAGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than VAB.TO's 3.20% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 3.24% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 1.91% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAB.TO Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.20% | 3.19% | 2.95% | 2.87% | 2.48% | 2.50% | 2.65% | 2.79% | 2.77% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
XAGH.TO vs. VAB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.26%, roughly equal to the maximum VAB.TO drawdown of -18.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGH.TO and VAB.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XAGH.TO vs. VAB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) is 2.39%, while Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that XAGH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.