WZRD vs. SCHB
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
WZRD vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -61.76% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 8.76% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -15.05%
- YTD
- -61.76%
- 6M
- -65.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
WZRD vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -61.76% | -10.73% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 8.76% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and SCHB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
SCHB
WZRD vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WZRD | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.35 | 0.82 | -2.17 |
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -71.81%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.81% | -35.27% | -36.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.95% | -2.97% | -65.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -4.11% | -19.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility
WZRD vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.62% | 12.43% | +38.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 17.28% | +33.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 18.33% | +32.29% |
WZRD vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than SCHB's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 3.37% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and SCHB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.
They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.03% for SCHB.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer