WZRD vs. ITOT
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. WZRD is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past year, WZRD returned -96.34% vs 21.81% for ITOT. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
WZRD vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -95.64% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 10.57% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- -24.11%
- 1M
- -66.67%
- 6M
- -94.79%
- YTD
- -95.64%
- 1Y
- -96.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -95.20%
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $209.16M | $238.83M | $306.83M | |
| $53.22K | $31.27K | $34.05K |
WZRD vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -95.64% | -18.13% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 10.57% | 12.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and ITOT is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
ITOT
WZRD vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WZRD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.54 | 1.27 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 2.23 | -3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.09 | 9.56 | -11.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than ITOT's maximum drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -55.20% | -41.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.46% | -8.90% | -87.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.46% | -1.34% | -95.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -6.93% | -26.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.06% | 2.07% | +43.99% |
Volatility
WZRD vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) has a higher volatility of 70.52% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 3.52%. This indicates that WZRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 70.52% | 3.52% | +67.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 99.00% | 10.27% | +88.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.72% | 13.14% | +83.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.69% | 17.47% | +75.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.69% | 18.27% | +74.42% |
WZRD vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.54%, more than ITOT's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 29.54% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and ITOT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WZRD has higher volatility (70.52%) compared to ITOT (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WZRD dropped -96.46% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 1-year performance, ITOT leads with 21.81% vs -96.34% for WZRD. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 21.81% return vs -96.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 29.54%, compared with 1.01% for ITOT.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer