ITOT vs. SCHB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB).
ITOT and SCHB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2004. SCHB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both ITOT and SCHB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ITOT or SCHB.
Key characteristics
| ITOT | SCHB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.88% | 4.91% |
| 1Y Return | 23.71% | 23.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.12% | 6.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.26% | 12.32% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.87% | 11.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.83 | 1.85 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.13% | 12.04% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.21% | -35.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.54% | -4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOT and SCHB is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ITOT vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ITOT having a 4.88% return and SCHB slightly higher at 4.91%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ITOT having a 11.87% annualized return and SCHB not far behind at 11.82%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITOT vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ITOT and SCHB have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ITOT vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ITOT vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SCHB's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% | 2.20% | 2.06% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.35% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.13% | 1.65% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.72% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
ITOT vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.21%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and SCHB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ITOT vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) have volatilities of 4.02% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.