CNAV vs. RWLC
CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) and RWLC (Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CNAV is actively managed, while RWLC is passively managed. Over the past year, CNAV returned 85.51% vs 22.59% for RWLC. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNAV charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for RWLC.
Performance
CNAV vs. RWLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNAV achieves a 55.93% return, which is significantly higher than RWLC's 11.76% return.
CNAV
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 17.69%
- YTD
- 55.93%
- 6M
- 53.70%
- 1Y
- 85.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWLC
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 11.76%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 22.59%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAV vs. RWLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 55.93% | 16.80% | 6.05% |
RWLC Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF | 11.76% | 20.23% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNAV and RWLC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CNAV and RWLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNAV vs. RWLC — Risk / Return Rank
CNAV
RWLC
CNAV vs. RWLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNAV | RWLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.29 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.63 | 2.43 | +4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.35 | 8.84 | +17.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNAV vs. RWLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNAV drawdown since its inception was -30.06%, which is greater than RWLC's maximum drawdown of -21.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAV and RWLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNAV | RWLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.06% | -21.00% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -9.33% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.45% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -5.39% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 2.56% | +0.70% |
Volatility
CNAV vs. RWLC - Volatility Comparison
Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a higher volatility of 14.93% compared to Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) at 4.64%. This indicates that CNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNAV | RWLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.93% | 4.64% | +10.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.63% | 10.48% | +14.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.28% | 14.38% | +13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.63% | 16.51% | +12.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.63% | 16.51% | +12.12% |
CNAV vs. RWLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNAV has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than RWLC's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNAV vs. RWLC - Dividend Comparison
CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RWLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWLC Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF | 13.14% | 14.69% | 0.98% | 1.63% | 1.39% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNAV and RWLC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNAV has higher volatility (14.93%) compared to RWLC (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNAV dropped -30.06% vs RWLC's -21.00%.
On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 85.51% vs 22.59% for RWLC. On fees, RWLC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, RWLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 85.51% return vs 22.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWLC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.
RWLC has the higher dividend yield at 13.14%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.
They also come from different issuers: Mohr and Rayliant. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for CNAV and 0.32% for RWLC.
CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNAV and RWLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer