CNAV vs. ABIG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) and ABIG (Argent Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CNAV returned 39.18% vs 16.16% for ABIG. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CNAV charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ABIG.

Performance

CNAV vs. ABIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNAV achieves a 24.51% return, which is significantly higher than ABIG's 9.74% return.

CNAV

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -10.01%
• 6M: 18.26%
• YTD: 24.51%
• 1Y: 39.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.73%

ABIG

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 9.37%
• YTD: 9.74%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF	$101.44K	$93.59K	$126.72K
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	$249.12K	$293.43K	$339.76K

CNAV vs. ABIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	24.51%	51.65%
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF	9.74%	27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CNAV and ABIG is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025	0.67

The correlation between CNAV and ABIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CNAV vs. ABIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 44
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

ABIG

ABIG Risk / Return Rank: 37
ABIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
ABIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ABIG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ABIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
ABIG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNAV vs. ABIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNAV	ABIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.01	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	1.47	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.18	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	1.03	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	3.66	+2.58

CNAV vs. ABIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the ABIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNAV and ABIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNAV vs. ABIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNAV drawdown since its inception was -30.06%, which is greater than ABIG's maximum drawdown of -13.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAV and ABIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNAV	ABIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.06%	-13.70%	-16.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.80%	-13.70%	-12.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.15%	0.00%	-20.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-2.15%	-3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	3.86%	+1.93%

Volatility

CNAV vs. ABIG - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a higher volatility of 15.97% compared to Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) at 4.48%. This indicates that CNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNAV	ABIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.97%	4.48%	+11.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.59%	10.98%	+20.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.30%	14.08%	+20.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.45%	16.63%	+14.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.45%	16.63%	+14.82%

CNAV vs. ABIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNAV has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ABIG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNAV vs. ABIG - Dividend Comparison

CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.

Position	TTM	2025
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF	0.09%	0.10%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNAV and ABIG in my portfolio?

CNAV and ABIG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNAV or ABIG?

CNAV has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to ABIG (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNAV dropped -30.06% vs ABIG's -13.70%.

Which ETF is better, CNAV or ABIG?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 39.18% vs 16.16% for ABIG. On fees, ABIG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ABIG has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNAV or ABIG?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 39.18% return vs 16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNAV or ABIG?

ABIG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNAV or ABIG?

ABIG has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between CNAV and ABIG?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr and Argent. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for CNAV and 0.49% for ABIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.