PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BDGS vs. AAPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BDGSAAPY
YTD Return12.74%6.24%
Daily Std Dev6.58%16.28%
Max Drawdown-5.38%-12.78%
Current Drawdown-0.15%-4.74%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between BDGS and AAPY is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BDGS vs. AAPY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BDGS achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than AAPY's 6.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
10.65%
12.65%
BDGS
AAPY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BDGS vs. AAPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDGS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPY's 0.99% expense ratio.


AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
Expense ratio chart for AAPY: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDGS vs. AAPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDGS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 4.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.88
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 21.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0021.11
AAPY
Sharpe ratio
No data

BDGS vs. AAPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

BDGS vs. AAPY - Dividend Comparison

BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than AAPY's 9.90% yield.


TTM2023
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.74%0.84%
AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
9.90%2.16%

Drawdowns

BDGS vs. AAPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDGS drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum AAPY drawdown of -12.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGS and AAPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.15%
-4.74%
BDGS
AAPY

Volatility

BDGS vs. AAPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) is 0.81%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that BDGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.81%
4.49%
BDGS
AAPY