BDGS vs. AMZP
Compare and contrast key facts about Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP).
BDGS and AMZP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023. AMZP is an actively managed fund by Kurv. It was launched on Oct 31, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDGS or AMZP.
Performance
BDGS vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDGS achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly lower than AMZP's 24.91% return.
BDGS
16.97%
2.70%
12.79%
18.92%
N/A
N/A
AMZP
24.91%
3.90%
5.16%
31.49%
N/A
N/A
Key characteristics
| BDGS | AMZP | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.10 | 1.42 |
| Sortino Ratio | 7.83 | 2.01 |
| Omega Ratio | 2.51 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 7.50 | 1.77 |
| Martin Ratio | 45.30 | 6.52 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.39% | 4.68% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.36% | 21.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.38% | -17.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.75% | -5.19% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BDGS vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDGS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZP's 0.99% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between BDGS and AMZP is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BDGS vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BDGS vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison
BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than AMZP's 13.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.72% | 0.84% |
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 12.52% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
BDGS vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDGS drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum AMZP drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGS and AMZP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BDGS vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) is 2.48%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that BDGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.