PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWJD vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WWJD vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWJD achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return.


WWJD

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.28%
YTD
7.15%
6M
9.72%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*

SPDW

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.56%
YTD
15.00%
6M
18.06%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWJD vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WWJD
Inspire International ESG ETF
7.15%29.28%1.05%16.42%-14.60%16.60%12.91%11.34%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.00%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%9.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WWJD and SPDW is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.93

The correlation between WWJD and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

WWJD vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WWJD
SPDW

Industrials

20.1%
19.2%

Financial Services

18.1%
22.9%

Basic Materials

13.8%
7.3%

Utilities

10.2%
3.3%

Energy

7.6%
5.5%

Technology

7.2%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
7.8%

Healthcare

5.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
5.7%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.5%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.8%

Industrials

WWJD
20.1%
SPDW
19.2%

Financial Services

WWJD
18.1%
SPDW
22.9%

Basic Materials

WWJD
13.8%
SPDW
7.3%

Utilities

WWJD
10.2%
SPDW
3.3%

Energy

WWJD
7.6%
SPDW
5.5%

Technology

WWJD
7.2%
SPDW
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

WWJD
6.9%
SPDW
7.8%

Healthcare

WWJD
5.6%
SPDW
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

WWJD
5.4%
SPDW
5.7%

Real Estate

WWJD
3.1%
SPDW
2.5%

Communication Services

WWJD
2.0%
SPDW
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWJD vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWJD
WWJD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
WWJD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWJD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWJD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
WWJD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWJD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWJD vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWJDSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.80

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

10.93

-3.91

WWJD vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWJD Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWJD and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWJDSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.07

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.57

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.24

+0.32

Drawdowns

WWJD vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWJD drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWJD and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWJDSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-60.02%

+24.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-11.55%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.97%

-13.53%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-30.21%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-0.87%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-12.91%

+5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.95%

-0.18%

Volatility

WWJD vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) is 4.73%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that WWJD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWJDSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

5.63%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

13.17%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

15.60%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

16.49%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

17.26%

+2.82%

WWJD vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWJD has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

WWJD vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

WWJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%
WWJD
Inspire International ESG ETF
2.21%2.58%2.99%2.56%2.09%15.22%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, WWJD and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to WWJD (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWJD dropped -35.76% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 5-year performance, SPDW leads with 9.38% vs 6.59% for WWJD. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, WWJD has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for WWJD.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.21% for WWJD.

WWJD tracks Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for WWJD and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWJD and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer