WWJD vs. BLES

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WWJD (Inspire International ESG ETF) and BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WWJD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index, while BLES is a Global Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WWJD returned 6.38%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for BLES. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WWJD charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for BLES.

Performance

WWJD vs. BLES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWJD achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly lower than BLES's 9.82% return.

WWJD

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -2.27%
• YTD: 5.07%
• 6M: 5.10%
• 1Y: 15.74%
• 3Y*: 14.71%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: —

BLES

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 9.21%
• 1Y: 20.14%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWJD vs. BLES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF	5.07%	29.28%	1.05%	16.42%	-14.60%	16.60%	12.91%	11.19%
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	9.82%	19.25%	5.59%	16.47%	-16.21%	24.36%	12.22%	10.03%

Correlation

The correlation between WWJD and BLES is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019	0.91

The correlation between WWJD and BLES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

WWJD vs. BLES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WWJD	BLES
Industrials	20.4%	20.3%
Financial Services	18.0%	13.0%
Basic Materials	14.0%	9.8%
Utilities	9.8%	7.0%
Technology	8.0%	17.6%
Energy	7.2%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	6.3%
Healthcare	5.7%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	4.4%
Real Estate	2.8%	7.6%
Communication Services	2.0%	1.0%

Return for Risk

WWJD vs. BLES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWJD

WWJD Risk / Return Rank: 33
WWJD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
WWJD Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
WWJD Omega Ratio Rank: 31
WWJD Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
WWJD Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BLES

BLES Risk / Return Rank: 50
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWJD vs. BLES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WWJD	BLES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.57	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.22	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.28	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	2.44	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.47	9.14	-3.67

WWJD vs. BLES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWJD Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the BLES Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWJD and BLES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WWJD vs. BLES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWJD drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum BLES drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWJD and BLES.

Drawdown Indicators

	WWJD	BLES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.76%	-40.35%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-8.29%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.97%	-15.46%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.10%	-26.61%	-2.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.82%	-2.45%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-6.02%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	2.21%	+0.67%

Volatility

WWJD vs. BLES - Volatility Comparison

Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) at 4.39%. This indicates that WWJD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WWJD	BLES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	4.39%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.29%	10.21%	+2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	12.92%	+1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	16.50%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.08%	18.93%	+1.15%

WWJD vs. BLES - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWJD has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BLES's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

WWJD vs. BLES - Dividend Comparison

WWJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than BLES's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	1.81%	1.97%	1.90%	1.80%	1.64%	9.28%	1.61%	2.16%	1.73%	2.01%
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF	2.25%	2.58%	2.99%	2.56%	2.09%	15.22%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WWJD and BLES in my portfolio?

WWJD and BLES have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WWJD or BLES?

WWJD has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to BLES (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWJD dropped -35.76% vs BLES's -40.35%.

Which ETF is better, WWJD or BLES?

On 5-year performance, BLES leads with 7.19% vs 6.38% for WWJD. On fees, BLES is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BLES has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WWJD or BLES?

Over the 5-year period, BLES has performed better with a 7.19% return vs 6.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WWJD or BLES?

BLES is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for WWJD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WWJD or BLES?

WWJD has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.81% for BLES.

What is the main difference between WWJD and BLES?

WWJD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BLES is Global Equities. WWJD tracks Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index, while BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for WWJD and 0.58% for BLES.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.