WWJD vs. IPOS
WWJD (Inspire International ESG ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - WWJD tracks the Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WWJD returned 6.59%/yr vs -7.69%/yr for IPOS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.80% expense ratio.
Performance
WWJD vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWJD achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return.
WWJD
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- —
IPOS
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 40.15%
- 6M
- 44.26%
- 1Y
- 65.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
WWJD vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF | 7.15% | 29.28% | 1.05% | 16.42% | -14.60% | 16.60% | 12.91% | 11.34% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 40.15% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between WWJD and IPOS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between WWJD and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WWJD vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WWJD
IPOS
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Industrials
WWJD
IPOS
Financial Services
WWJD
IPOS
Basic Materials
WWJD
IPOS
Utilities
WWJD
IPOS
Energy
WWJD
IPOS
Technology
WWJD
IPOS
Consumer Cyclical
WWJD
IPOS
Healthcare
WWJD
IPOS
Consumer Defensive
WWJD
IPOS
Real Estate
WWJD
IPOS
-
Communication Services
WWJD
IPOS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WWJD vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
WWJD
IPOS
WWJD vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WWJD | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.41 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.83 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 11.58 | -4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WWJD | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.24 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | -0.28 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.09 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
WWJD vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWJD drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWJD and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWJD | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -73.09% | +37.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -17.17% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.97% | -34.08% | +19.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -69.93% | +40.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -40.44% | +37.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -31.99% | +25.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 5.67% | -2.90% |
Volatility
WWJD vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) is 4.73%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that WWJD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WWJD | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 12.05% | -7.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 26.45% | -14.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 29.41% | -15.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 27.19% | -10.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 24.13% | -4.05% |
WWJD vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WWJD and IPOS have an expense ratio of 0.80%.
Dividends
WWJD vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
WWJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.68% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF | 2.21% | 2.58% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 2.09% | 15.22% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WWJD and IPOS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to WWJD (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWJD dropped -35.76% vs IPOS's -73.09%.
On 5-year performance, WWJD leads with 6.59% vs -7.69% for IPOS. Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. On volatility, WWJD has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WWJD has performed better with a 6.59% return vs -7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WWJD and IPOS have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.
WWJD has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.
WWJD tracks Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Renaissance Capital.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WWJD and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer