WTS vs. IGV
WTS (Watts Water Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Over the past 10 years, WTS returned 20.25%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for IGV. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WTS vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTS achieves a 21.12% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -14.18% return. Over the past 10 years, WTS has outperformed IGV with an annualized return of 20.25%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.87% annualized return.
WTS
- 1D
- 3.81%
- 1M
- 11.26%
- YTD
- 21.12%
- 6M
- 19.78%
- 1Y
- 38.75%
- 3Y*
- 24.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.38%
- 10Y*
- 20.25%
IGV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- -14.18%
- 6M
- -16.00%
- 1Y
- -15.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
WTS vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 21.12% | 36.85% | -1.62% | 43.57% | -24.08% | 60.63% | 23.14% | 56.20% | -14.13% | 17.84% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -14.18% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTS and IGV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WTS and IGV has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTS vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
WTS
IGV
WTS vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTS | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.93 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | -0.42 | +2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | -0.87 | +7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTS vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTS drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTS and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTS | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -63.45% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -36.61% | +21.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -36.61% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.08% | -45.85% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -45.85% | +1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -23.00% | +22.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -14.45% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 17.55% | -11.58% |
Volatility
WTS vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is 7.01%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 12.57%. This indicates that WTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTS | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 12.57% | -5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.66% | 24.80% | -8.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 28.06% | -5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.84% | 27.92% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.24% | 26.39% | +1.85% |
Dividends
WTS vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 0.66% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.90% | 1.27% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTS and IGV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to WTS (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTS dropped -63.68% vs IGV's -63.45%.
WTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTS and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer