WTS vs. ETN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN).

Performance

WTS vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WTS vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc.	6.32%	36.85%	-1.62%	43.57%	-24.08%	60.63%	23.14%	56.20%	-14.13%	17.84%
ETN Eaton Corporation plc	15.13%	-2.79%	39.51%	56.22%	-7.18%	46.70%	29.88%	42.76%	-10.04%	21.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WTS : $9.79B ETN : $142.39B
EPS WTS : $10.18 ETN : $10.47
PE Ratio WTS : 28.77 ETN : 34.93
PEG Ratio WTS : 1.35 ETN : 1.90
PS Ratio WTS : 4.02 ETN : 5.20
PB Ratio WTS : 4.83 ETN : 7.31
Total Revenue (TTM) WTS : $2.44B ETN : $27.45B
Gross Profit (TTM) WTS : $1.21B ETN : $10.32B
EBITDA (TTM) WTS : $509.60M ETN : $5.90B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTS achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 15.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WTS has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 19.25%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.98% annualized return.

WTS

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -10.04%
• YTD: 6.32%
• 6M: 5.62%
• 1Y: 43.20%
• 3Y*: 21.25%
• 5Y*: 20.35%
• 10Y*: 19.25%

ETN

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 15.13%
• 6M: -1.64%
• 1Y: 33.74%
• 3Y*: 30.52%
• 5Y*: 23.26%
• 10Y*: 21.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WTS vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTS

WTS Risk / Return Rank: 85
WTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
WTS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
WTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
WTS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ETN

ETN Risk / Return Rank: 71
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTS vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTS	ETN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	0.99	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.51	+0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.20	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	1.89	+1.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.14	4.21	+5.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTS vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTS and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTS	ETN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	0.99	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.80	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.74	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.41	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between WTS and ETN is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WTS vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than ETN's 1.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc.	0.71%	0.72%	0.81%	0.66%	0.79%	0.52%	0.76%	0.90%	1.27%	0.99%	1.09%	1.33%
ETN Eaton Corporation plc	1.15%	1.31%	1.13%	1.43%	2.06%	1.76%	1.88%	3.00%	3.85%	3.04%	3.40%	4.23%

Drawdowns

WTS vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTS drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTS and ETN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTS	ETN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-68.95%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.45%	-19.14%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.08%	-34.46%	-9.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.08%	-44.55%	+0.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.70%	-7.42%	-5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.23%	-14.93%	-1.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.41%	8.58%	-4.17%

Volatility

WTS vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is 6.39%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that WTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTS	ETN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	10.43%	-4.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.49%	23.39%	-5.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.09%	34.38%	-6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.83%	29.21%	-1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.18%	29.65%	-1.47%

Financials

WTS vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 309.20M and revenue of 625.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 7.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

WTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 113.70M and revenue of 625.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.38B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

WTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 83.70M and revenue of 625.10M, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.