WTS vs. FIW
WTS (Watts Water Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while FIW (First Trust Water ETF) is Water Equities fund tracking the ISE Clean Edge Water Index. Over the past 10 years, WTS returned 20.05%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for FIW. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
WTS vs. FIW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTS achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly higher than FIW's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, WTS has outperformed FIW with an annualized return of 20.05%, while FIW has yielded a comparatively lower 12.38% annualized return.
WTS
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- 6M
- 15.95%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 34.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.97%
- 10Y*
- 20.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.86%
FIW
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 1.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.33M | $5.43M | $6.04M | |
| $63.19M | $76.42M | $125.98M |
WTS vs. FIW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 25.73% | 36.85% | -1.62% | 43.57% | -24.08% | 60.63% | 23.14% | 56.20% | -14.13% | 17.84% |
FIW First Trust Water ETF | 0.42% | 7.20% | 8.38% | 20.35% | -15.70% | 32.00% | 21.15% | 37.37% | -9.23% | 24.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTS and FIW is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.75 |
The correlation between WTS and FIW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTS vs. FIW — Risk / Return Rank
WTS
FIW
WTS vs. FIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTS | FIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.02 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 0.06 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 0.15 | +4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTS vs. FIW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTS drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than FIW's maximum drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTS and FIW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTS | FIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -52.75% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -13.81% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -18.32% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.08% | -28.53% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -36.60% | -7.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -5.82% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -8.29% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.77% | 6.05% | +0.72% |
Volatility
WTS vs. FIW - Volatility Comparison
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to First Trust Water ETF (FIW) at 5.47%. This indicates that WTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTS | FIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 5.47% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.23% | 12.58% | +8.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.70% | 16.53% | +10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.48% | 18.49% | +9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.44% | 19.92% | +8.52% |
Dividends
WTS vs. FIW - Dividend Comparison
WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FIW's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIW First Trust Water ETF | 0.72% | 0.69% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.73% | 1.13% | 0.51% | 0.76% |
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 0.63% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.90% | 1.27% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTS and FIW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTS has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to FIW (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTS dropped -63.68% vs FIW's -52.75%.
WTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTS and FIW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer