WSM vs. ANF
WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — WSM in Specialty Retail, ANF in Apparel Retail. Over the past 10 years, WSM returned 26.42%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for ANF. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WSM vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 25.12% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -26.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed ANF with an annualized return of 26.42%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively lower 18.54% annualized return.
WSM
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 25.12%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 53.28%
- 5Y*
- 25.78%
- 10Y*
- 26.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.01%
ANF
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -3.41%
- 3Y*
- 36.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.87%
WSM vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 25.12% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -26.86% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and ANF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 1996 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
WSM:
$26.04B
ANF:
$4.09B
WSM:
$8.93
ANF:
$10.45
WSM:
24.77
ANF:
8.81
WSM:
5.01
ANF:
0.00
WSM:
3.42
ANF:
0.82
WSM:
14.18
ANF:
3.14
WSM:
$7.88B
ANF:
$5.28B
WSM:
$3.63B
ANF:
$2.56B
WSM:
$1.49B
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSM vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
WSM
ANF
WSM vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | -0.08 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | -0.13 | +3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSM vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -86.59% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.27% | -45.65% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.79% | -65.89% | +29.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.92% | -69.93% | +18.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.71% | -72.45% | +12.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.62% | -52.14% | +44.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -42.94% | +17.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.36% | 26.21% | -15.85% |
Volatility
WSM vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) is 8.19%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 11.65%. This indicates that WSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 11.65% | -3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.34% | 33.16% | -7.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.57% | 61.93% | -27.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.79% | 61.09% | -16.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.22% | 61.01% | -16.79% |
Dividends
WSM vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
WSM vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WSM vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WSM and ANF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (11.65%) compared to WSM (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSM dropped -89.01% vs ANF's -86.59%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSM and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer