PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRLD vs. ABT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WRLD vs. ABT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRLD achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's -29.78% return. Over the past 10 years, WRLD has outperformed ABT with an annualized return of 15.02%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.


WRLD

1D
0.38%
1M
18.24%
YTD
18.39%
6M
4.40%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
15.02%

ABT

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
-29.78%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-33.61%
3Y*
-3.93%
5Y*
-2.65%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRLD vs. ABT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRLD
World Acceptance Corporation
18.39%24.86%-13.86%97.95%-73.13%140.10%18.31%-15.51%26.68%25.58%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
-29.78%12.87%4.81%2.26%-20.68%30.53%28.04%22.08%29.06%52.03%

Correlation

The correlation between WRLD and ABT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 1991

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WRLD:

$788.67M

ABT:

$151.97B

EPS

WRLD:

$6.93

ABT:

$3.59

PE Ratio

WRLD:

23.99

ABT:

24.24

PEG Ratio

WRLD:

0.56

ABT:

1.51

PS Ratio

WRLD:

1.43

ABT:

3.37

PB Ratio

WRLD:

0.75

ABT:

2.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

WRLD:

$585.74M

ABT:

$45.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WRLD:

$582.56M

ABT:

$25.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

WRLD:

$96.81M

ABT:

$10.80B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRLD vs. ABT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRLD
WRLD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
WRLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WRLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ABT
ABT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ABT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ABT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRLD vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRLDABTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.74

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

-0.86

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

-2.00

+2.30

WRLD vs. ABT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the ABT Sharpe Ratio of -1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRLD and ABT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRLDABTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

-1.41

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

-0.12

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.44

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.49

-0.24

Drawdowns

WRLD vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRLD drawdown since its inception was -77.65%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD and ABT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRLDABTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.65%

-45.66%

-31.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.34%

-38.99%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.37%

-39.64%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.00%

-39.64%

-37.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.00%

-39.64%

-37.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.83%

-36.40%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.22%

-10.83%

-22.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.90%

16.86%

+2.04%

Volatility

WRLD vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison

World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to Abbott Laboratories (ABT) at 7.34%. This indicates that WRLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRLDABTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.34%

7.34%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.13%

18.93%

+18.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.82%

23.96%

+24.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.11%

21.97%

+33.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.21%

23.63%

+31.58%

Dividends

WRLD vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison

WRLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
2.80%1.88%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%
WRLD
World Acceptance Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WRLD vs. ABT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between World Acceptance Corporation and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
177.57M
11.16B
(WRLD) Total Revenue
(ABT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WRLD and ABT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRLD has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to ABT (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRLD dropped -77.65% vs ABT's -45.66%.

WRLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRLD and ABT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer