WRLD vs. TFLO

In the year-to-date period, WRLD achieves a 37.39% return, which is significantly higher than TFLO's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, WRLD has outperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 7.37%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.97% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WRLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 15.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRLD and TFLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WRLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.

The maximum WRLD drawdown since its inception was -77.65%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD and TFLO.

World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.10%. This indicates that WRLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.