WRB vs. VGT
WRB (W. R. Berkley Corporation) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, WRB returned 18.28%/yr vs 25.49%/yr for VGT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WRB vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 18.28%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.
WRB
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- -2.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.09%
- 5Y*
- 19.20%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
VGT
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 21.50%
- 1Y
- 46.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.13%
- 5Y*
- 19.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.49%
WRB vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 1.13% | 23.02% | 27.19% | 0.25% | 33.92% | 27.39% | -3.14% | 43.80% | 5.96% | 10.21% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 23.32% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRB and VGT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.36 |
The correlation between WRB and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRB vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
WRB
VGT
WRB vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WRB | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.35 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 2.87 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 8.76 | -9.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRB vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRB | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.33% | -54.63% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -16.40% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -27.23% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -35.07% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.35% | -35.07% | -10.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.17% | -7.71% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -7.95% | -6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.43% | 5.36% | +4.07% |
Volatility
WRB vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) is 7.78%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that WRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRB | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 11.39% | -3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 18.58% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.64% | 22.72% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 25.55% | -2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 24.77% | -0.19% |
Dividends
WRB vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 4.45% | 2.64% | 2.39% | 2.73% | 1.22% | 2.44% | 0.71% | 2.43% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRB and VGT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to WRB (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRB dropped -69.33% vs VGT's -54.63%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WRB and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer