WQTM vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

WQTM vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WQTM

• 1D: -3.80%
• 1M: 23.76%
• YTD: 53.55%
• 6M: 48.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQTM vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund	0.71%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WQTM and ARMH is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.20

Return for Risk

WQTM vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WQTM	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	471,500.14	-471,498.89

Drawdowns

WQTM vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	WQTM	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-1.61%	-24.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.80%	0.00%	-3.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.75%	-0.40%	-11.35%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WQTM	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.98%	113.00%	-71.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.98%	113.00%	-71.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.98%	113.00%	-71.02%

WQTM vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

WQTM vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither WQTM nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WQTM and ARMH in my portfolio?

WQTM and ARMH have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WQTM or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WQTM or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WQTM or ARMH?

WQTM and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WQTM and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.19% for ARMH.