PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOOD vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOOD vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 24.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 5.20%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 20.21% annualized return.


WOOD

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-6.95%
6M
-3.23%
1Y
-6.85%
3Y*
-0.20%
5Y*
-3.93%
10Y*
5.20%

XME

1D
-3.24%
1M
9.89%
YTD
24.13%
6M
29.19%
1Y
103.84%
3Y*
40.26%
5Y*
23.59%
10Y*
20.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOOD vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
-6.95%-3.27%-4.21%13.84%-19.39%17.03%20.36%19.75%-17.73%34.49%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
24.13%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between WOOD and XME is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.63

The correlation between WOOD and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WOOD vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WOOD
XME

Basic Materials

63.6%
75.3%

Consumer Cyclical

23.5%

-

Real Estate

12.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.8%

Energy

-

23.4%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.4%

Technology

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

WOOD
63.6%
XME
75.3%

Consumer Cyclical

WOOD
23.5%
XME

-

Real Estate

WOOD
12.9%
XME

-

Communication Services

WOOD

-

XME

-

Consumer Defensive

WOOD

-

XME
0.8%

Energy

WOOD

-

XME
23.4%

Financial Services

WOOD

-

XME

-

Healthcare

WOOD

-

XME

-

Industrials

WOOD

-

XME
0.4%

Technology

WOOD

-

XME
2.2%

Utilities

WOOD

-

XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOOD vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOOD
WOOD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
WOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOOD vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOODXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.44

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

4.62

-4.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

11.75

-12.49

WOOD vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the XME Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOOD and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOODXMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

3.02

-3.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.73

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.62

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.18

-0.03

Drawdowns

WOOD vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOODXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.25%

-85.89%

+22.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.64%

-22.60%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-30.47%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.71%

-37.27%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.20%

-61.69%

+11.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.31%

-3.24%

-21.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-44.14%

+29.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.27%

8.87%

+0.40%

Volatility

WOOD vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is 5.70%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 12.42%. This indicates that WOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOODXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

12.42%

-6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

26.73%

-12.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

34.65%

-15.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

32.54%

-12.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

32.84%

-10.97%

WOOD vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOOD vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than XME's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
2.69%2.51%2.09%1.64%2.26%1.24%0.98%1.85%2.82%1.19%1.65%2.04%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.30%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


WOOD and XME have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to WOOD (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOD dropped -63.25% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 20.21% vs 5.20% for WOOD. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 20.21% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.

WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.30% for XME.

WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WOOD and 0.35% for XME.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOOD and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer