WOOD vs. FMAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) and FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) are both Materials funds - WOOD tracks the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index while FMAT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WOOD returned 5.20%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for FMAT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WOOD charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FMAT.

Performance

WOOD vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than FMAT's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD has underperformed FMAT with an annualized return of 5.20%, while FMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.

WOOD

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -6.95%
• 6M: -3.23%
• 1Y: -6.85%
• 3Y*: -0.20%
• 5Y*: -3.93%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

FMAT

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOOD vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	-6.95%	-3.27%	-4.21%	13.84%	-19.39%	17.03%	20.36%	19.75%	-17.73%	34.49%
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	13.04%	12.11%	0.47%	13.71%	-11.54%	27.45%	19.57%	23.35%	-17.40%	23.51%

Correlation

The correlation between WOOD and FMAT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.74

The correlation between WOOD and FMAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

WOOD vs. FMAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WOOD	FMAT
Basic Materials	63.6%	90.1%
Consumer Cyclical	23.5%	8.3%
Real Estate	12.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.5%
Industrials	-	0.1%
Technology	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WOOD vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOOD

WOOD Risk / Return Rank: 5
WOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

FMAT

FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 34
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOOD vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WOOD	FMAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	1.28	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.40	1.85	-2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.22	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	1.68	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.74	5.51	-6.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WOOD vs. FMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the FMAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOOD and FMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WOOD	FMAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.37	1.28	-1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.30	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.49	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.45	-0.29

Drawdowns

WOOD vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, which is greater than FMAT's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and FMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	WOOD	FMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.25%	-41.11%	-22.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.64%	-13.48%	-8.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-23.17%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.71%	-25.40%	-5.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.20%	-41.11%	-9.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.31%	-3.97%	-20.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-6.87%	-7.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.27%	4.09%	+5.18%

Volatility

WOOD vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is 5.70%, while Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that WOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WOOD	FMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.70%	6.14%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.96%	13.95%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.70%	17.66%	+1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.72%	19.60%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.87%	21.19%	+0.68%

WOOD vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

WOOD vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison

WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than FMAT's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	1.42%	1.64%	1.68%	1.71%	2.00%	1.44%	1.73%	1.89%	2.18%	1.53%	1.78%	2.16%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	2.69%	2.51%	2.09%	1.64%	2.26%	1.24%	0.98%	1.85%	2.82%	1.19%	1.65%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WOOD and FMAT in my portfolio?

WOOD and FMAT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WOOD or FMAT?

FMAT has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to WOOD (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOD dropped -63.25% vs FMAT's -41.11%.

Which ETF is better, WOOD or FMAT?

On 10-year performance, FMAT leads with 10.33% vs 5.20% for WOOD. On fees, FMAT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WOOD or FMAT?

Over the 10-year period, FMAT has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WOOD or FMAT?

FMAT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WOOD or FMAT?

WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.42% for FMAT.

What is the main difference between WOOD and FMAT?

WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while FMAT tracks MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WOOD and 0.08% for FMAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.