FMAT vs. XLB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB).

FMAT and XLB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FMAT is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. XLB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Materials Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both FMAT and XLB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FMAT vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FMAT vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	8.92%	12.11%	0.47%	13.71%	-11.54%	27.45%	19.57%	23.35%	-17.40%	23.51%
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF	10.68%	9.94%	0.15%	12.46%	-12.30%	27.44%	20.46%	24.13%	-14.88%	24.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAT achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 10.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMAT having a 10.53% annualized return and XLB not far behind at 10.45%.

FMAT

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: -7.47%
• YTD: 8.92%
• 6M: 10.77%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

XLB

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -6.02%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 12.59%
• 1Y: 18.51%
• 3Y*: 9.53%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 10.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAT vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XLB

Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

FMAT

Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

Return for Risk

FMAT vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAT

FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 59
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

XLB

XLB Risk / Return Rank: 54
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 49
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAT vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMAT	XLB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	0.89	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.38	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.18	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	1.35	+0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.36	4.72	+0.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMAT vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAT and XLB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMAT	XLB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	0.89	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.36	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.51	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.36	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FMAT and XLB is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FMAT vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

FMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than XLB's 1.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	1.47%	1.64%	1.68%	1.71%	2.00%	1.44%	1.73%	1.89%	2.18%	1.53%	1.78%	2.16%
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.75%	1.92%	1.92%	2.00%	2.26%	1.62%	1.72%	1.98%	2.20%	1.66%	1.95%	2.24%

Drawdowns

FMAT vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAT drawdown since its inception was -41.11%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAT and XLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMAT	XLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.11%	-59.83%	+18.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.21%	-14.64%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.40%	-24.72%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.11%	-37.27%	-3.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.47%	-6.39%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.90%	-10.88%	+3.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	4.20%	-0.06%

Volatility

FMAT vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 6.28%. This indicates that FMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMAT	XLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.09%	6.28%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.34%	12.53%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.38%	20.95%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.54%	18.91%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.14%	20.62%	+0.52%