FMAT vs. FXAIX

In the year-to-date period, FMAT achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FMAT has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 7.26%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FMAT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FMAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAT and FXAIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than FXAIX's 1.26% yield.

The maximum FMAT drawdown since its inception was -41.11%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAT and FXAIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) is 5.29%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that FMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.