WOMN vs. VUG
WOMN (Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - WOMN tracks the Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WOMN returned 8.60%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WOMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
WOMN vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOMN achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return.
WOMN
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
WOMN vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF | 3.93% | 8.62% | 16.95% | 28.19% | -20.61% | 24.89% | 34.16% | 32.50% | -11.94% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOMN and VUG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between WOMN and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WOMN vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WOMN
VUG
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
WOMN
VUG
Financial Services
WOMN
VUG
Healthcare
WOMN
VUG
Communication Services
WOMN
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
WOMN
VUG
Consumer Defensive
WOMN
VUG
Industrials
WOMN
VUG
Energy
WOMN
VUG
Utilities
WOMN
VUG
Real Estate
WOMN
VUG
Basic Materials
WOMN
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOMN vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
WOMN
VUG
WOMN vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WOMN | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.69 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 5.92 | -0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WOMN | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.77 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.68 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.62 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
WOMN vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOMN drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOMN and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOMN | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.23% | -50.68% | +18.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -16.53% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.34% | -22.85% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -35.61% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -1.51% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -7.09% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 4.71% | -2.59% |
Volatility
WOMN vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) is 2.67%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that WOMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOMN | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 3.83% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 12.11% | -4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.82% | 15.84% | -5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 22.22% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 21.44% | -2.74% |
WOMN vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WOMN vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
WOMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF | 0.79% | 0.76% | 1.08% | 1.80% | 5.59% | 3.10% | 6.15% | 1.12% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WOMN and VUG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to WOMN (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOMN dropped -32.23% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.11% vs 8.60% for WOMN. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, WOMN has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WOMN.
WOMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
WOMN tracks Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WOMN and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOMN and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer