Correlation
The correlation between WOMN and XLG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
WOMN vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
WOMN and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WOMN is a passively managed fund by Impact Shares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2018. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both WOMN and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WOMN or XLG.
Performance
WOMN vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
WOMN:
0.76
XLG:
0.69
WOMN:
0.99
XLG:
0.97
WOMN:
1.15
XLG:
1.14
WOMN:
0.64
XLG:
0.64
WOMN:
2.43
XLG:
2.16
WOMN:
4.55%
XLG:
6.09%
WOMN:
17.35%
XLG:
22.30%
WOMN:
-32.20%
XLG:
-52.39%
WOMN:
-5.28%
XLG:
-4.63%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOMN achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -1.25% return.
WOMN
0.50%
3.96%
-3.59%
11.78%
12.27%
16.26%
N/A
XLG
-1.25%
6.26%
-0.70%
14.67%
17.76%
17.64%
14.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WOMN vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WOMN vs. XLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WOMN
XLG
WOMN vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
WOMN vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
WOMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than XLG's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF | 1.12% | 1.07% | 1.80% | 8.82% | 3.10% | 6.15% | 1.11% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
WOMN vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOMN drawdown since its inception was -32.20%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOMN and XLG.
Loading data...
Volatility
WOMN vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) is 4.50%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that WOMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...