Correlation
The correlation between WOMN and BDGS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
WOMN vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
WOMN and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WOMN is a passively managed fund by Impact Shares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2018. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WOMN or BDGS.
Performance
WOMN vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
WOMN:
0.76
BDGS:
1.49
WOMN:
0.99
BDGS:
2.34
WOMN:
1.15
BDGS:
1.43
WOMN:
0.64
BDGS:
1.86
WOMN:
2.43
BDGS:
8.69
WOMN:
4.55%
BDGS:
1.95%
WOMN:
17.35%
BDGS:
11.54%
WOMN:
-32.20%
BDGS:
-9.12%
WOMN:
-5.28%
BDGS:
-0.62%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOMN achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 2.08% return.
WOMN
0.50%
3.96%
-3.59%
11.78%
12.27%
16.26%
N/A
BDGS
2.08%
1.96%
2.66%
16.98%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WOMN vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WOMN vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WOMN
BDGS
WOMN vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
WOMN vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
WOMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than BDGS's 1.77% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF | 1.12% | 1.07% | 1.80% | 8.82% | 3.10% | 6.15% | 1.11% | 0.90% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 1.77% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WOMN vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOMN drawdown since its inception was -32.20%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOMN and BDGS.
Loading data...
Volatility
WOMN vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.23%. This indicates that WOMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...