WLFC vs. EAT
WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. WLFC operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, WLFC returned 23.34%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for EAT. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WLFC vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLFC achieves a 40.80% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's 11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, WLFC has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 23.34%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.68% annualized return.
WLFC
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -10.11%
- YTD
- 40.80%
- 6M
- 43.65%
- 1Y
- 31.69%
- 3Y*
- 66.56%
- 5Y*
- 33.79%
- 10Y*
- 23.34%
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 26.08%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -9.63%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
WLFC vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 40.80% | -34.14% | 332.92% | -17.17% | 56.73% | 23.60% | -48.29% | 70.26% | 38.57% | -2.38% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLFC and EAT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 1996 | 0.14 |
The correlation between WLFC and EAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WLFC:
$1.38B
EAT:
$7.09B
WLFC:
$17.02
EAT:
$10.14
WLFC:
11.18
EAT:
15.71
WLFC:
0.00
EAT:
0.36
WLFC:
1.78
EAT:
1.27
WLFC:
1.99
EAT:
17.46
WLFC:
$757.62M
EAT:
$5.73B
WLFC:
$405.87M
EAT:
$3.45B
WLFC:
$416.98M
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLFC vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
WLFC
EAT
WLFC vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLFC | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.22 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | -0.44 | +2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLFC vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLFC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, roughly equal to the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLFC and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLFC | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -88.40% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.84% | -44.41% | +12.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.88% | -45.92% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | -65.54% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.76% | -84.94% | +5.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.21% | -15.77% | -4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.35% | -24.33% | -18.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.87% | 21.77% | -5.90% |
Volatility
WLFC vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 15.23%. This indicates that WLFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLFC | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.30% | 15.23% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.76% | 36.27% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.92% | 46.95% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.82% | 49.04% | -6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.96% | 55.13% | -4.17% |
Dividends
WLFC vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
WLFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WLFC vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Willis Lease Finance Corporation and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WLFC vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
WLFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 194.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
WLFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 33.79M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
WLFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a net income of 23.66M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WLFC and EAT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLFC has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to EAT (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLFC dropped -88.12% vs EAT's -88.40%.
WLFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLFC and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer