WISGX vs. NEAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX).
WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013. NEAGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001.
Performance
WISGX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WISGX vs. NEAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.94% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | 3.03% | 26.05% |
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 11.92% | 26.40% | 14.31% | 37.65% | -27.53% | 37.56% | 51.53% | 43.82% | -16.09% | 8.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WISGX achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than NEAGX's 11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, WISGX has underperformed NEAGX with an annualized return of 13.10%, while NEAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.
WISGX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
NEAGX
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 60.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WISGX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WISGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WISGX vs. NEAGX — Risk / Return Rank
WISGX
NEAGX
WISGX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WISGX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 2.14 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 2.71 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 4.27 | -2.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 15.19 | -9.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WISGX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.14 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.62 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.76 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.59 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between WISGX and NEAGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WISGX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison
WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 1.91% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.10% | 3.91% | 10.64% | 16.57% | 5.17% | 6.72% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
WISGX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WISGX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, roughly equal to the maximum NEAGX drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WISGX and NEAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WISGX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -41.80% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.26% | -14.01% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.22% | -36.31% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | -36.31% | -6.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.74% | -7.75% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -8.72% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.93% | -0.24% |
Volatility
WISGX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) is 9.23%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that WISGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WISGX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 11.64% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.49% | 19.84% | -4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.34% | 28.93% | -4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 24.33% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 23.90% | +0.03% |