PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WISGX vs. WTIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WISGX vs. WTIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WISGX achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly higher than WTIBX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, WISGX has outperformed WTIBX with an annualized return of 14.11%, while WTIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.25% annualized return.


WISGX

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.86%
YTD
16.01%
6M
16.16%
1Y
31.32%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
14.11%

WTIBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.45%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
2.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WISGX vs. WTIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WISGX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund
16.01%6.85%15.75%18.32%-32.48%11.79%57.84%28.67%3.03%26.05%
WTIBX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund
0.42%7.38%1.99%7.47%-13.13%-0.58%8.49%8.80%-0.17%4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between WISGX and WTIBX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2013

-0.01

The correlation between WISGX and WTIBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WISGX vs. WTIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WISGX
WISGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
WISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIBX
WTIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WTIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WISGX vs. WTIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WISGXWTIBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.44

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

2.15

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.94

+0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.41

6.03

+4.38

WISGX vs. WTIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WISGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the WTIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WISGX and WTIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WISGXWTIBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.44

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.13

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.48

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.03

-0.55

Drawdowns

WISGX vs. WTIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WISGX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than WTIBX's maximum drawdown of -17.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WISGX and WTIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WISGXWTIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.22%

-17.72%

-25.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-2.97%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.87%

-5.83%

-23.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.22%

-17.72%

-25.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

-17.72%

-25.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.59%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.55%

-1.95%

-10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

0.96%

+2.18%

Volatility

WISGX vs. WTIBX - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) at 1.39%. This indicates that WISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WISGXWTIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

1.39%

+4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.89%

2.75%

+13.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.37%

3.86%

+16.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.50%

5.64%

+18.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.01%

4.67%

+19.34%

WISGX vs. WTIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WISGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIBX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

WISGX vs. WTIBX - Dividend Comparison

WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WISGX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%29.83%7.74%0.00%0.09%
WTIBX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund
4.14%4.11%4.04%3.66%3.23%3.08%3.95%3.95%3.55%3.50%3.43%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


WISGX and WTIBX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WISGX has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to WTIBX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WISGX dropped -43.22% vs WTIBX's -17.72%.

WISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WISGX and WTIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer