WISGX vs. EMCAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WISGX (Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WISGX returned 14.17%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for EMCAX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WISGX charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.

Performance

WISGX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WISGX achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than EMCAX's 11.03% return. Over the past 10 years, WISGX has outperformed EMCAX with an annualized return of 14.17%, while EMCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.

WISGX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 3.44%
• YTD: 16.57%
• 6M: 14.79%
• 1Y: 30.18%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: 14.17%

EMCAX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 7.84%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 4.28%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WISGX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund	16.57%	6.85%	15.75%	18.32%	-32.48%	11.79%	57.84%	28.67%	3.03%	26.05%
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	11.03%	2.37%	13.89%	12.43%	-16.06%	16.07%	27.81%	19.10%	-4.64%	21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WISGX and EMCAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2013	0.89

The correlation between WISGX and EMCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WISGX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WISGX

WISGX Risk / Return Rank: 38
WISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
WISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
WISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
WISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

EMCAX

EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 23
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WISGX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WISGX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.20	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	1.85	+0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	1.98	+0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.21	7.46	+2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WISGX vs. EMCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WISGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the EMCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WISGX and EMCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WISGX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	1.20	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.24	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.53	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.46	+0.02

Drawdowns

WISGX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WISGX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WISGX and EMCAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WISGX	EMCAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-51.81%	+8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-8.60%	-3.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.87%	-19.19%	-9.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.22%	-30.60%	-12.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	-42.79%	-0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-2.58%	+2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.54%	-13.27%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	2.28%	+0.86%

Volatility

WISGX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 4.64%. This indicates that WISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WISGX	EMCAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.26%	4.64%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	11.27%	+4.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.33%	14.15%	+6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.50%	18.17%	+6.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	20.24%	+3.77%

WISGX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WISGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

WISGX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison

WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	0.12%	0.13%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	7.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	29.83%	7.74%	0.00%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WISGX and EMCAX in my portfolio?

WISGX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WISGX or EMCAX?

WISGX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to EMCAX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WISGX dropped -43.22% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.