NEAGX vs. CSMCX

In the year-to-date period, NEAGX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than CSMCX's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAGX has outperformed CSMCX with an annualized return of 6.95%, while CSMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.67% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMCX's 1.00% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NEAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the CSMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAGX and CSMCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither NEAGX nor CSMCX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -53.03%, smaller than the maximum CSMCX drawdown of -59.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and CSMCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) at 5.23%. This indicates that NEAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.