PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAGX vs. OBMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAGX vs. OBMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAGX achieves a 57.98% return, which is significantly higher than OBMCX's 43.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NEAGX having a 22.39% annualized return and OBMCX not far behind at 21.47%.


NEAGX

1D
-0.99%
1M
12.44%
YTD
57.98%
6M
57.43%
1Y
92.85%
3Y*
38.19%
5Y*
23.00%
10Y*
22.39%

OBMCX

1D
-1.32%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
43.75%
6M
42.14%
1Y
74.23%
3Y*
29.19%
5Y*
19.33%
10Y*
21.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAGX vs. OBMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
57.98%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
43.75%14.70%22.82%18.87%-10.57%53.20%29.91%21.94%-12.04%27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAGX and OBMCX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001

0.82

The correlation between NEAGX and OBMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAGX vs. OBMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

OBMCX
OBMCX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
OBMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
OBMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAGX vs. OBMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEAGXOBMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.48

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.78

6.03

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.31

24.24

+3.08

NEAGX vs. OBMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is comparable to the OBMCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAGX and OBMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEAGXOBMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68

3.02

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.74

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.83

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.45

+0.21

Drawdowns

NEAGX vs. OBMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum OBMCX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and OBMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAGXOBMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-68.24%

+26.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-12.45%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-28.11%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-28.11%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-50.04%

+13.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-1.32%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-16.42%

+7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

3.09%

+0.38%

Volatility

NEAGX vs. OBMCX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) at 8.30%. This indicates that NEAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEAGXOBMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.21%

8.30%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.45%

18.64%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.84%

24.93%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.57%

26.21%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.15%

25.88%

-1.73%

NEAGX vs. OBMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than OBMCX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEAGX vs. OBMCX - Dividend Comparison

NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than OBMCX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.35%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
0.98%1.41%2.53%0.00%1.37%24.35%0.00%0.00%19.67%11.76%0.05%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAGX and OBMCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAGX has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to OBMCX (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAGX dropped -41.80% vs OBMCX's -68.24%.

NEAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAGX and OBMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer