WISGX vs. WTLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX).
WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013. WTLTX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jun 1, 1988.
Performance
WISGX vs. WTLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WISGX vs. WTLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | -2.24% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | 3.03% | 26.05% |
WTLTX Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund | -1.02% | 7.97% | 5.53% | 12.16% | -9.75% | 3.13% | 7.31% | 12.21% | -2.19% | 6.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WISGX achieves a -2.24% return, which is significantly lower than WTLTX's -1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, WISGX has outperformed WTLTX with an annualized return of 12.62%, while WTLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.83% annualized return.
WISGX
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- YTD
- -2.24%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
WTLTX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 5.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WISGX vs. WTLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WISGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than WTLTX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WISGX vs. WTLTX — Risk / Return Rank
WISGX
WTLTX
WISGX vs. WTLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WISGX | WTLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 1.85 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 2.44 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 1.95 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 9.20 | -5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WISGX | WTLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.85 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.79 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 1.07 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.08 | -0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between WISGX and WTLTX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WISGX vs. WTLTX - Dividend Comparison
WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
WTLTX Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund | 3.80% | 4.09% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 3.88% | 4.88% | 4.76% | 4.55% | 4.51% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
WISGX vs. WTLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WISGX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than WTLTX's maximum drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WISGX and WTLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WISGX | WTLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -38.46% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.26% | -2.51% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.22% | -13.35% | -29.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | -16.97% | -26.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.48% | -1.89% | -10.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -3.27% | -9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 0.53% | +3.13% |
Volatility
WISGX vs. WTLTX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) at 1.07%. This indicates that WISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WISGX | WTLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 1.07% | +7.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 1.53% | +13.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.02% | 2.74% | +21.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 4.33% | +20.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 4.52% | +19.37% |