PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAGX vs. SFSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAGX vs. SFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAGX achieves a 54.53% return, which is significantly higher than SFSNX's 14.75% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAGX has outperformed SFSNX with an annualized return of 22.12%, while SFSNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.86% annualized return.


NEAGX

1D
1.06%
1M
12.81%
YTD
54.53%
6M
59.73%
1Y
93.95%
3Y*
37.18%
5Y*
22.53%
10Y*
22.12%

SFSNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.12%
YTD
14.75%
6M
15.52%
1Y
32.66%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAGX vs. SFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
54.53%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
14.75%7.66%8.99%20.15%-14.79%30.91%8.49%24.44%-12.26%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAGX and SFSNX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.82

The correlation between NEAGX and SFSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAGX vs. SFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SFSNX
SFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAGX vs. SFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEAGXSFSNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.67

1.90

+1.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.19

2.74

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.33

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.60

3.37

+3.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.66

10.99

+15.67

NEAGX vs. SFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the SFSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAGX and SFSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEAGXSFSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67

1.90

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.33

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.47

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.39

+0.26

Drawdowns

NEAGX vs. SFSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum SFSNX drawdown of -58.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and SFSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAGXSFSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-58.32%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-9.43%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-25.91%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-25.91%

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-44.82%

+8.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.64%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-8.32%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.89%

+0.58%

Volatility

NEAGX vs. SFSNX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) at 4.44%. This indicates that NEAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEAGXSFSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

4.44%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.26%

11.76%

+8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.69%

17.10%

+8.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.53%

20.81%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

23.27%

+0.86%

NEAGX vs. SFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SFSNX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEAGX vs. SFSNX - Dividend Comparison

NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than SFSNX's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.38%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
1.19%1.36%1.71%1.37%7.05%12.27%1.42%3.66%11.55%6.88%1.86%6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAGX and SFSNX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAGX has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to SFSNX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAGX dropped -41.80% vs SFSNX's -58.32%.

NEAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAGX and SFSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer