WINN vs. VEA
WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WINN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. WINN is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WINN returned 23.93%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for VEA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WINN charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
WINN vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.
WINN
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 7.07%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
WINN vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF | 8.60% | 14.31% | 31.64% | 52.44% | -26.67% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between WINN and VEA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between WINN and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
WINN vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WINN
VEA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
WINN
VEA
Communication Services
WINN
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
WINN
VEA
Healthcare
WINN
VEA
Financial Services
WINN
VEA
Industrials
WINN
VEA
Consumer Defensive
WINN
VEA
Utilities
WINN
VEA
Real Estate
WINN
VEA
Basic Materials
WINN
-
VEA
Energy
WINN
-
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WINN vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
WINN
VEA
WINN vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WINN | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.09 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 2.87 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.81 | -1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.05 | 10.94 | -6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WINN | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.09 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.25 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
WINN vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WINN | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.07% | -60.68% | +28.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.06% | -11.63% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -13.45% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.90% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -13.29% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 2.98% | +2.79% |
Volatility
WINN vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is 3.71%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that WINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WINN | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 5.66% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.19% | 13.32% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 15.66% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 16.55% | +7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 17.36% | +6.38% |
WINN vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WINN vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WINN and VEA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to WINN (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINN dropped -32.07% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 3-year performance, WINN leads with 23.93% vs 19.77% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, WINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, WINN has performed better with a 23.93% return vs 19.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.
WINN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for WINN and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WINN and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer