PortfoliosLab logo
WINN vs. FMAG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and FMAG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

WINN vs. FMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WINN:

0.53

FMAG:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

WINN:

0.91

FMAG:

0.97

Omega Ratio

WINN:

1.13

FMAG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

WINN:

0.58

FMAG:

0.68

Martin Ratio

WINN:

1.88

FMAG:

2.35

Ulcer Index

WINN:

7.35%

FMAG:

5.81%

Daily Std Dev

WINN:

25.95%

FMAG:

22.91%

Max Drawdown

WINN:

-32.08%

FMAG:

-32.93%

Current Drawdown

WINN:

-4.40%

FMAG:

-1.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than FMAG's 4.95% return.


WINN

YTD

0.51%

1M

8.66%

6M

1.60%

1Y

13.63%

3Y*

21.02%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FMAG

YTD

4.95%

1M

9.14%

6M

2.63%

1Y

14.72%

3Y*

17.54%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF

Fidelity Magellan ETF

WINN vs. FMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WINN vs. FMAG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WINN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WINN is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WINN is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WINN is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WINN is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WINN is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WINN is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMAG is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMAG is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMAG is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMAG is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMAG is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMAG is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WINN vs. FMAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the FMAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and FMAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

WINN vs. FMAG - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


TTM2024202320222021
WINN
Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
0.00%0.00%0.06%0.06%0.00%
FMAG
Fidelity Magellan ETF
0.12%0.15%0.34%0.23%0.03%

Drawdowns

WINN vs. FMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.08%, roughly equal to the maximum FMAG drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and FMAG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

WINN vs. FMAG - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) at 4.57%. This indicates that WINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...