WINN vs. HACAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) and HACAX (Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Harbor. Over the past 3 years, WINN returned 23.93%/yr vs 29.20%/yr for HACAX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WINN charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for HACAX.

Performance

WINN vs. HACAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than HACAX's 10.34% return.

WINN

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 6.86%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 7.07%
• 1Y: 22.26%
• 3Y*: 23.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HACAX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 8.09%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 6M: 9.00%
• 1Y: 22.73%
• 3Y*: 29.20%
• 5Y*: 14.93%
• 10Y*: 19.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WINN vs. HACAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	8.60%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-26.67%
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I	10.34%	13.95%	46.37%	53.74%	-26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and HACAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2022	0.98

The correlation between WINN and HACAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WINN vs. HACAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 33
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 28

HACAX

HACAX Risk / Return Rank: 20
HACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
HACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
HACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WINN vs. HACAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WINN	HACAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.46	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.03	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	4.24	-0.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WINN vs. HACAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the HACAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and HACAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WINN	HACAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	1.46	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.62	+0.02

Drawdowns

WINN vs. HACAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum HACAX drawdown of -63.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and HACAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WINN	HACAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-63.05%	+30.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-17.96%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-27.37%	+3.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	0.00%	-0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-16.22%	+7.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	5.68%	+0.09%

Volatility

WINN vs. HACAX - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WINN	HACAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	3.71%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.19%	12.36%	-0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	16.38%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.74%	25.82%	-2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.74%	24.37%	-0.63%

WINN vs. HACAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than HACAX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

WINN vs. HACAX - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I	10.20%	11.25%	21.75%	0.00%	0.00%	18.64%	12.25%	8.88%	10.97%	11.56%	6.26%	6.83%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WINN and HACAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, WINN and HACAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WINN or HACAX?

HACAX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to WINN (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINN dropped -32.07% vs HACAX's -63.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.