WINN vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WINN returned 20.32%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for TDVG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WINN charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

WINN vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 8.04% return.

WINN

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 1.85%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 13.47%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 17.57%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WINN vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	1.85%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-27.98%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	8.04%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-6.91%

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and TDVG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022	0.71

The correlation between WINN and TDVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WINN vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WINN	TDVG
Technology	52.8%	26.2%
Communication Services	14.1%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	7.2%
Industrials	6.5%	13.6%
Healthcare	6.1%	12.4%
Financial Services	3.7%	19.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	6.9%
Utilities	2.2%	3.8%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Energy	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

WINN vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 22
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 56
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WINN vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WINN	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.81	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	2.60	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.32	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	2.44	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.29	10.01	-7.72

WINN vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WINN vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WINN	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-19.20%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-7.24%	-10.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-14.02%	-9.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.85%	-0.82%	-6.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-3.73%	-5.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.89%	1.76%	+4.13%

Volatility

WINN vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.78%. This indicates that WINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WINN	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.77%	2.78%	+3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.35%	7.61%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	9.79%	+7.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.79%	13.92%	+9.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.79%	13.90%	+9.89%

WINN vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WINN vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WINN and TDVG in my portfolio?

WINN and TDVG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WINN or TDVG?

WINN has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to TDVG (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINN dropped -32.07% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, WINN or TDVG?

On 3-year performance, WINN leads with 20.32% vs 15.55% for TDVG. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WINN or TDVG?

Over the 3-year period, WINN has performed better with a 20.32% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WINN or TDVG?

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WINN or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.

What is the main difference between WINN and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for WINN and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.