WINN vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. WINN is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WINN returned 20.32%/yr vs 22.13%/yr for SCHG. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WINN charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

WINN vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return.

WINN

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 1.85%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 13.47%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WINN vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	1.85%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-27.98%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and SCHG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022	0.98

The correlation between WINN and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

WINN vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WINN	SCHG
Technology	52.8%	46.7%
Communication Services	14.1%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	12.4%
Industrials	6.5%	6.0%
Healthcare	6.1%	8.4%
Financial Services	3.7%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	1.6%
Utilities	2.2%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.4%	0.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Energy	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

WINN vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 22
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WINN vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WINN	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.11	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	1.56	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.20	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	1.10	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.29	3.58	-1.29

WINN vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WINN vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WINN	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-34.59%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-16.41%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-23.39%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.85%	-6.46%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-5.20%	-3.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.89%	5.02%	+0.87%

Volatility

WINN vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that WINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WINN	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.77%	5.91%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.35%	12.52%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	16.24%	+0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.79%	22.38%	+1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.79%	21.58%	+2.21%

WINN vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

WINN vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WINN and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, WINN and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WINN or SCHG?

WINN has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINN dropped -32.07% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, WINN or SCHG?

On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 22.13% vs 20.32% for WINN. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WINN or SCHG?

Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 22.13% return vs 20.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WINN or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WINN or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.

What is the main difference between WINN and SCHG?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for WINN and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.