WGS vs. VIPS
WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) and VIPS (Vipshop Holdings Limited) are both stocks. WGS operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while VIPS operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, WGS returned -33.09%/yr vs -7.56%/yr for VIPS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WGS vs. VIPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -59.23% return, which is significantly lower than VIPS's -16.34% return.
WGS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -21.95%
- YTD
- -59.23%
- 6M
- -66.94%
- 1Y
- -27.18%
- 3Y*
- 101.82%
- 5Y*
- -33.09%
- 10Y*
- —
VIPS
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- -16.34%
- 6M
- -25.02%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -0.40%
- 5Y*
- -7.56%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
WGS vs. VIPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | -59.23% | 69.22% | 2,694.91% | -68.41% | -94.09% | -59.60% | 12.65% |
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited | -16.34% | 36.31% | -22.25% | 30.21% | 62.38% | -70.12% | 32.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGS and VIPS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2020 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
WGS:
$1.56B
VIPS:
$7.00B
WGS:
-$2.71
VIPS:
$14.88
WGS:
3.44
VIPS:
0.07
WGS:
6.12
VIPS:
0.17
WGS:
$442.68M
VIPS:
$106.06B
WGS:
$302.56M
VIPS:
$24.86B
WGS:
-$51.08M
VIPS:
$9.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGS vs. VIPS — Risk / Return Rank
WGS
VIPS
WGS vs. VIPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WGS | VIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.05 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.14 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 0.29 | -1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WGS | VIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 0.13 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | -0.14 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.46 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
WGS vs. VIPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than VIPS's maximum drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and VIPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGS | VIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -86.75% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -29.79% | -49.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.28% | -39.32% | -44.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.73% | -74.11% | -25.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.78% | -65.45% | -28.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -48.33% | -35.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.97% | 15.05% | +21.92% |
Volatility
WGS vs. VIPS - Volatility Comparison
GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a higher volatility of 72.31% compared to Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) at 9.93%. This indicates that WGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGS | VIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 72.31% | 9.93% | +62.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.67% | 24.14% | +59.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.86% | 32.56% | +51.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.84% | 53.00% | +56.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.46% | 55.42% | +52.04% |
Dividends
WGS vs. VIPS - Dividend Comparison
WGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited | 4.36% | 2.71% | 3.19% |
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WGS vs. VIPS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Vipshop Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WGS vs. VIPS - Profitability Comparison
WGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 68.21M and revenue of 102.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.7%.
VIPS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 6.46B and revenue of 26.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
WGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -57.47M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.2%.
VIPS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 26.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
WGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -63.32M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in a net margin of -61.9%.
VIPS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 26.41B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WGS and VIPS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGS has higher volatility (72.31%) compared to VIPS (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs VIPS's -86.75%.
VIPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGS and VIPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer