WGS vs. OSCR
WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) and OSCR (Oscar Health, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — WGS in Health Information Services, OSCR in Healthcare Plans. Over the past 5 years, WGS returned -29.44%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for OSCR. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WGS vs. OSCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -49.94% return, which is significantly lower than OSCR's 117.26% return.
WGS
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- -32.36%
- YTD
- -49.94%
- 1Y
- -35.92%
- 3Y*
- 104.44%
- 5Y*
- -29.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.38%
OSCR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- 6M
- 117.56%
- YTD
- 117.26%
- 1Y
- 129.90%
- 3Y*
- 60.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $128.55M | $136.76M | $181.50M | |
| $43.35M | $44.61M | $68.76M |
WGS vs. OSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | -49.94% | 69.22% | 2,694.91% | -68.41% | -94.09% | -77.42% |
OSCR Oscar Health, Inc. | 117.26% | 6.92% | 46.89% | 271.95% | -68.66% | -78.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGS and OSCR is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between WGS and OSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WGS:
$1.93B
OSCR:
$8.09B
WGS:
-$2.75
OSCR:
-$0.14
WGS:
4.17
OSCR:
0.68
WGS:
7.52
OSCR:
6.19
WGS:
$442.68M
OSCR:
$13.30B
WGS:
$302.56M
OSCR:
$895.79M
WGS:
-$51.08M
OSCR:
$19.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGS vs. OSCR — Risk / Return Rank
WGS
OSCR
WGS vs. OSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WGS | OSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.30 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 2.38 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 4.92 | -5.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WGS vs. OSCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than OSCR's maximum drawdown of -94.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and OSCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGS | OSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -94.15% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -51.71% | -27.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.63% | -53.39% | -29.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.69% | -88.23% | -11.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.36% | -15.09% | -77.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.56% | -63.84% | -19.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.51% | 24.95% | +19.56% |
Volatility
WGS vs. OSCR - Volatility Comparison
GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a higher volatility of 20.98% compared to Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) at 15.53%. This indicates that WGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGS | OSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.98% | 15.53% | +5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.94% | 45.75% | +41.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.15% | 70.91% | +12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.05% | 80.94% | +29.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.80% | 79.51% | +27.29% |
Dividends
WGS vs. OSCR - Dividend Comparison
Neither WGS nor OSCR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
WGS vs. OSCR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Oscar Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WGS vs. OSCR - Profitability Comparison
WGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 68.21M and revenue of 102.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.7%.
OSCR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Oscar Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -57.47M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.2%.
OSCR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Oscar Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 704.09M and revenue of 4.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
WGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -63.32M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in a net margin of -61.9%.
OSCR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Oscar Health, Inc. reported a net income of 679.00M and revenue of 4.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WGS and OSCR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGS has higher volatility (20.98%) compared to OSCR (15.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs OSCR's -94.15%.
OSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGS and OSCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer