WGS vs. SEZL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) and SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. WGS operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past year, WGS returned -17.28% vs 6.41% for SEZL. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WGS vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -57.39% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 146.51% return.

WGS

• 1D: -6.08%
• 1M: 17.14%
• YTD: -57.39%
• 6M: -60.46%
• 1Y: -17.28%
• 3Y*: 108.32%
• 5Y*: -33.26%
• 10Y*: —

SEZL

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: 52.21%
• YTD: 146.51%
• 6M: 108.21%
• 1Y: 6.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGS vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp.	-57.39%	69.22%	2,694.91%	-45.00%
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	146.51%	48.89%	1,146.59%	-9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between WGS and SEZL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023	0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap WGS : $1.63B SEZL : $5.47B
EPS WGS : -$2.71 SEZL : $4.15
PS Ratio WGS : 3.59 SEZL : 11.63
PB Ratio WGS : 6.40 SEZL : 27.78
Total Revenue (TTM) WGS : $442.68M SEZL : $480.91M
Gross Profit (TTM) WGS : $302.56M SEZL : $426.79M
EBITDA (TTM) WGS : -$51.08M SEZL : $193.18M

Return for Risk

WGS vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGS

WGS Risk / Return Rank: 37
WGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
WGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
WGS Omega Ratio Rank: 41
WGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
WGS Martin Ratio Rank: 34

SEZL

SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 46
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGS vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGS	SEZL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	0.07	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	0.76	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.10	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	0.09	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.44	0.12	-0.56

WGS vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGS and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGS vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than SEZL's maximum drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and SEZL.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGS	SEZL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.85%	-89.95%	-9.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.40%	-72.02%	-7.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.49%	-14.10%	-79.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.38%	-40.13%	-43.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.64%	53.67%	-14.03%

Volatility

WGS vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a higher volatility of 22.89% compared to Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) at 20.91%. This indicates that WGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGS	SEZL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.89%	20.91%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	85.99%	62.39%	+23.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	85.81%	88.11%	-2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	110.05%	204.04%	-93.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	107.34%	204.04%	-96.70%

Dividends

WGS vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

Neither WGS nor SEZL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WGS vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 68.21M and revenue of 102.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.7%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

WGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -57.47M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.2%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

WGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -63.32M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in a net margin of -61.9%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGS and SEZL in my portfolio?

WGS and SEZL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGS or SEZL?

WGS has higher volatility (22.89%) compared to SEZL (20.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs SEZL's -89.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEZL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.