VIPS vs. CROX
VIPS (Vipshop Holdings Limited) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — VIPS in Internet Retail, CROX in Footwear & Accessories. Over the past 10 years, VIPS returned 1.91%/yr vs 32.33%/yr for CROX. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VIPS vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIPS achieves a -8.51% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 60.57% return. Over the past 10 years, VIPS has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 32.33% annualized return.
VIPS
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 16.58%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- -0.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.32%
CROX
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- 9.17%
- 6M
- 58.29%
- YTD
- 60.57%
- 1Y
- 34.63%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 32.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | $166.11M | $141.78M | $142.51M |
| $25.53M | $27.98M | $35.90M |
VIPS vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited | -8.51% | 36.31% | -22.25% | 30.21% | 62.38% | -70.12% | 98.38% | 159.52% | -53.41% | 6.45% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 60.57% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 61.24% | 105.54% | 84.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIPS and CROX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2012 | 0.23 |
The correlation between VIPS and CROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VIPS:
$7.65B
CROX:
$6.58B
VIPS:
CN¥14.96
CROX:
$11.49
VIPS:
7.00
CROX:
11.95
VIPS:
0.32
CROX:
0.24
VIPS:
0.49
CROX:
1.75
VIPS:
1.26
CROX:
4.97
VIPS:
CN¥106.06B
CROX:
$4.05B
VIPS:
CN¥24.86B
CROX:
$2.33B
VIPS:
CN¥9.24B
CROX:
$803.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIPS vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
VIPS
CROX
VIPS vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIPS | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.18 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.15 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | 2.04 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIPS vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIPS drawdown since its inception was -86.75%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIPS and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIPS | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.75% | -98.74% | +11.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.93% | -30.19% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.32% | -54.04% | +14.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.88% | -73.86% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.75% | -75.18% | -11.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.22% | -23.95% | -38.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.56% | -61.06% | +12.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.31% | 17.03% | +2.28% |
Volatility
VIPS vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is 5.81%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 14.47%. This indicates that VIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIPS | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 14.47% | -8.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.12% | 34.65% | -12.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.60% | 53.86% | -21.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.08% | 55.36% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.30% | 55.58% | -0.28% |
Dividends
VIPS vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
VIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited | 3.99% | 2.71% | 3.19% |
Financials
VIPS vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vipshop Holdings Limited and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VIPS vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
VIPS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 6.46B and revenue of 26.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 700.71M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
VIPS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 26.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 285.68M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
VIPS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 26.41B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 204.89M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VIPS and CROX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CROX has higher volatility (14.47%) compared to VIPS (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIPS dropped -86.75% vs CROX's -98.74%.
CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIPS and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer