PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WGS vs. SPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WGS and SPY is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

WGS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
198.57%
10.45%
WGS
SPY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WGS:

14.95

SPY:

1.88

Sortino Ratio

WGS:

7.02

SPY:

2.53

Omega Ratio

WGS:

1.86

SPY:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

WGS:

19.23

SPY:

2.83

Martin Ratio

WGS:

155.05

SPY:

11.74

Ulcer Index

WGS:

12.33%

SPY:

2.02%

Daily Std Dev

WGS:

128.13%

SPY:

12.64%

Max Drawdown

WGS:

-99.85%

SPY:

-55.19%

Current Drawdown

WGS:

-88.07%

SPY:

-0.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a 32.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 4.15% return.


WGS

YTD

32.16%

1M

36.61%

6M

198.59%

1Y

1,361.58%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SPY

YTD

4.15%

1M

1.22%

6M

10.44%

1Y

24.34%

5Y*

14.62%

10Y*

13.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WGS vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WGS is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WGS is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WGS is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WGS is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WGS is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WGS is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPY is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPY is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPY is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPY is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPY is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPY is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WGS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WGS, currently valued at 14.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.0014.951.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for WGS, currently valued at 7.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.007.022.53
The chart of Omega ratio for WGS, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.861.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for WGS, currently valued at 19.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.0019.232.83
The chart of Martin ratio for WGS, currently valued at 155.05, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00155.0511.74
WGS
SPY

The current WGS Sharpe Ratio is 14.95, which is higher than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGS and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
14.95
1.88
WGS
SPY

Dividends

WGS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

WGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WGS
GeneDx Holdings Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.16%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%1.87%

Drawdowns

WGS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-88.07%
-0.42%
WGS
SPY

Volatility

WGS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a higher volatility of 47.64% compared to SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.93%. This indicates that WGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
47.64%
2.93%
WGS
SPY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab