WGS vs. LLY
WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — WGS in Health Information Services, LLY in Drug Manufacturers - General. Over the past 5 years, WGS returned -28.82%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for LLY. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WGS vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -46.25% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 9.23% return.
WGS
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- -18.09%
- YTD
- -46.25%
- 1Y
- -34.45%
- 3Y*
- 113.93%
- 5Y*
- -28.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -23.39%
LLY
- 1D
- 4.86%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 53.81%
- 3Y*
- 38.53%
- 5Y*
- 36.02%
- 10Y*
- 32.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.42B | $3.10B | $3.43B | |
| $67.85M | $54.27M | $60.99M |
WGS vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | -46.25% | 69.22% | 2,694.91% | -68.41% | -94.09% | -59.60% | 12.65% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 9.23% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 29.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGS and LLY is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2020 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
WGS:
$2.08B
LLY:
$1.10T
WGS:
-$3.71
LLY:
$29.79
WGS:
4.41
LLY:
13.17
WGS:
8.50
LLY:
30.86
WGS:
$454.43M
LLY:
$79.67B
WGS:
$309.90M
LLY:
$66.93B
WGS:
-$83.53M
LLY:
$35.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGS vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
WGS
LLY
WGS vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WGS | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 2.33 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 6.43 | -7.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WGS vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGS | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -68.24% | -31.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -23.18% | -56.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.46% | -34.48% | -46.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.69% | -34.48% | -65.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.79% | -5.32% | -86.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.57% | -19.17% | -64.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.96% | 8.57% | +36.39% |
Volatility
WGS vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a higher volatility of 20.30% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.71%. This indicates that WGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGS | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.30% | 9.71% | +10.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 87.04% | 27.87% | +59.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.11% | 38.53% | +44.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.11% | 32.68% | +77.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.72% | 30.42% | +76.30% |
Dividends
WGS vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
WGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.55% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WGS vs. LLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WGS vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison
WGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 78.24M and revenue of 114.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.
LLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 19.71B and revenue of 22.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.8%.
WGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -17.46M and revenue of 114.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -15.3%.
LLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 8.98B and revenue of 22.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.
WGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -17.74M and revenue of 114.44M, resulting in a net margin of -15.5%.
LLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.10B and revenue of 22.97B, resulting in a net margin of 30.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WGS and LLY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGS has higher volatility (20.30%) compared to LLY (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs LLY's -68.24%.
LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGS and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer