WGS vs. QQQ

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, WGS returned -28.82%/yr vs 14.96%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

WGS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -46.25% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 17.04% return.

WGS

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: -18.09%
• YTD: -46.25%
• 1Y: -34.45%
• 3Y*: 113.93%
• 5Y*: -28.82%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -23.39%

QQQ

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: 18.69%
• YTD: 17.04%
• 1Y: 28.64%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 14.96%
• 10Y*: 20.75%
• ALL TIME*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	$34.07B	$28.96B	$31.85B
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp.	$67.85M	$54.27M	$60.99M

WGS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp.	-46.25%	69.22%	2,694.91%	-68.41%	-94.09%	-59.60%	12.65%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	17.04%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	14.44%

Correlation

The correlation between WGS and QQQ is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2020	0.36

Return for Risk

WGS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WGS

WGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
WGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
WGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
WGS Omega Ratio Rank: 30
WGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
WGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WGS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGS	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	1.47	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	2.05	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.26	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	2.40	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.77	7.62	-8.39

WGS vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGS and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGS	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.85%	-82.97%	-16.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.40%	-11.96%	-67.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.46%	-22.77%	-58.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.69%	-35.12%	-64.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.79%	-3.76%	-88.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.57%	-32.61%	-50.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.96%	3.77%	+41.19%

Volatility

WGS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a higher volatility of 20.30% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 7.44%. This indicates that WGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGS	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.30%	7.44%	+12.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	87.04%	16.38%	+70.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.11%	19.56%	+63.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	110.11%	22.97%	+87.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.72%	22.53%	+84.19%

Dividends

WGS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

WGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.42%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGS and QQQ in my portfolio?

WGS and QQQ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGS or QQQ?

WGS has higher volatility (20.30%) compared to QQQ (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.