WGS vs. ASM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM).

Performance

WGS vs. ASM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WGS vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp.	-50.62%	69.22%	2,694.91%	-68.41%	-94.09%	-59.60%	12.65%
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.	1.77%	604.88%	68.13%	-22.95%	-21.01%	-33.77%	37.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WGS : $1.73B ASM : $1.04B
EPS WGS : -$0.74 ASM : $0.17
PS Ratio WGS : 4.28 ASM : 11.37
PB Ratio WGS : 5.60 ASM : 4.45
Total Revenue (TTM) WGS : $427.54M ASM : $88.12M
Gross Profit (TTM) WGS : $298.17M ASM : $44.14M
EBITDA (TTM) WGS : -$13.08M ASM : $39.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -50.62% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's 1.77% return.

WGS

• 1D: 7.73%
• 1M: -19.43%
• YTD: -50.62%
• 6M: -40.39%
• 1Y: -27.49%
• 3Y*: 74.70%
• 5Y*: -34.98%
• 10Y*: —

ASM

• 1D: 8.78%
• 1M: -34.30%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 6M: 20.38%
• 1Y: 243.48%
• 3Y*: 92.57%
• 5Y*: 37.41%
• 10Y*: 20.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WGS vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGS

WGS Risk / Return Rank: 29
WGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
WGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
WGS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
WGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
WGS Martin Ratio Rank: 24

ASM

ASM Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ASM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGS vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WGS	ASM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	2.93	-3.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	3.03	-2.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.38	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	4.47	-4.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	13.63	-14.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WGS vs. ASM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the ASM Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGS and ASM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WGS	ASM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	2.93	-3.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	0.58	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.24	0.09	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between WGS and ASM is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WGS vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison

Neither WGS nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WGS vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and ASM.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGS	ASM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.85%	-94.10%	-5.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.92%	-52.40%	-13.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.78%	-70.08%	-29.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-90.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.46%	-43.77%	-48.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.03%	-64.02%	-19.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.23%	17.20%	+13.03%

Volatility

WGS vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) is 25.28%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 28.16%. This indicates that WGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGS	ASM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.28%	28.16%	-2.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.05%	67.30%	-20.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.64%	83.71%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	107.43%	65.03%	+42.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.41%	70.32%	+36.09%

Financials

WGS vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 84.27M and revenue of 120.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.

ASM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 13.45M and revenue of 26.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

WGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -14.24M and revenue of 120.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.8%.

ASM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 9.80M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.

WGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -17.67M and revenue of 120.99M, resulting in a net margin of -14.6%.

ASM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 10.62M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.