WGS vs. ASM
WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. WGS operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, WGS returned -29.44%/yr vs 38.05%/yr for ASM. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WGS vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -49.94% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's -13.62% return.
WGS
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- -32.36%
- YTD
- -49.94%
- 1Y
- -35.92%
- 3Y*
- 104.44%
- 5Y*
- -29.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.38%
ASM
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -18.35%
- 6M
- -40.33%
- YTD
- -13.62%
- 1Y
- 66.08%
- 3Y*
- 95.22%
- 5Y*
- 38.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.80M | $17.78M | $25.63M | |
| $43.35M | $44.61M | $68.76M |
WGS vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | -49.94% | 69.22% | 2,694.91% | -68.41% | -94.09% | -59.60% | 12.65% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -13.62% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGS and ASM is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2020 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
WGS:
$1.93B
ASM:
$907.17M
WGS:
-$2.75
ASM:
$0.22
WGS:
4.17
ASM:
7.95
WGS:
7.52
ASM:
3.35
WGS:
$442.68M
ASM:
$110.70M
WGS:
$302.56M
ASM:
$59.09M
WGS:
-$51.08M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGS vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
WGS
ASM
WGS vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.19 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 1.30 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 2.33 | -3.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WGS vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -94.10% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -52.81% | -26.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.63% | -52.81% | -29.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.69% | -60.20% | -39.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.36% | -52.27% | -40.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.56% | -63.65% | -19.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.51% | 29.32% | +15.19% |
Volatility
WGS vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) is 20.98%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 22.56%. This indicates that WGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.98% | 22.56% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.94% | 63.44% | +23.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.15% | 82.98% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.05% | 66.60% | +43.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.80% | 69.91% | +36.89% |
Dividends
WGS vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
WGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.68% |
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | 0.00% |
Financials
WGS vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WGS vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison
WGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 68.21M and revenue of 102.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.7%.
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
WGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -57.47M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.2%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
WGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -63.32M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in a net margin of -61.9%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WGS and ASM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (22.56%) compared to WGS (20.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGS and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer