WGS vs. ASM
Compare and contrast key facts about GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM).
Performance
WGS vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WGS vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | -49.62% | 69.22% | 2,694.91% | -68.41% | -94.09% | -59.60% | 12.65% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 6.12% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 37.10% |
Fundamentals
WGS:
$1.76B
ASM:
$1.08B
WGS:
-$0.74
ASM:
$0.17
WGS:
4.36
ASM:
11.86
WGS:
5.72
ASM:
4.64
WGS:
$427.54M
ASM:
$88.12M
WGS:
$298.17M
ASM:
$44.14M
WGS:
-$13.08M
ASM:
$39.90M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -49.62% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's 6.12% return.
WGS
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -11.70%
- YTD
- -49.62%
- 6M
- -42.24%
- 1Y
- -22.54%
- 3Y*
- 75.87%
- 5Y*
- -34.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ASM
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -29.97%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 22.04%
- 1Y
- 276.57%
- 3Y*
- 95.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.57%
- 10Y*
- 20.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGS vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
WGS
ASM
WGS vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | 3.33 | -3.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.18 | 3.21 | -3.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.41 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 4.93 | -5.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 14.91 | -15.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 3.33 | -3.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.60 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.09 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between WGS and ASM is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WGS vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
Neither WGS nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WGS vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and ASM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -94.10% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.92% | -52.40% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.78% | -70.08% | -29.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.31% | -41.37% | -50.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.03% | -64.01% | -19.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.46% | 17.32% | +13.14% |
Volatility
WGS vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) is 25.03%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 26.89%. This indicates that WGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.03% | 26.89% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.83% | 67.40% | -20.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.57% | 83.72% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.29% | 65.03% | +42.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.37% | 70.31% | +36.06% |
Financials
WGS vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WGS vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison
WGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 84.27M and revenue of 120.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 13.45M and revenue of 26.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.
WGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -14.24M and revenue of 120.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.8%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 9.80M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
WGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -17.67M and revenue of 120.99M, resulting in a net margin of -14.6%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 10.62M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.