WGS vs. ASM
WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. WGS operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, WGS returned -32.92%/yr vs 38.35%/yr for ASM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WGS vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -55.34% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's -5.31% return.
WGS
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- 22.76%
- YTD
- -55.34%
- 6M
- -57.09%
- 1Y
- -27.14%
- 3Y*
- 111.60%
- 5Y*
- -32.92%
- 10Y*
- —
ASM
- 1D
- -8.41%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -5.31%
- 6M
- -13.91%
- 1Y
- 69.94%
- 3Y*
- 107.69%
- 5Y*
- 38.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
WGS vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | -55.34% | 69.22% | 2,694.91% | -68.41% | -94.09% | -59.60% | 12.65% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -5.31% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGS and ASM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2020 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
WGS:
$1.70B
ASM:
$1.02B
WGS:
-$2.71
ASM:
$0.23
WGS:
3.76
ASM:
8.62
WGS:
6.70
ASM:
3.70
WGS:
$442.68M
ASM:
$110.70M
WGS:
$302.56M
ASM:
$59.09M
WGS:
-$51.08M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGS vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
WGS
ASM
WGS vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.19 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 1.34 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 2.77 | -3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WGS vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -94.10% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -52.40% | -27.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.28% | -52.40% | -31.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.73% | -63.94% | -35.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.18% | -47.69% | -45.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.39% | -63.74% | -19.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.86% | 25.37% | +14.49% |
Volatility
WGS vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) is 22.71%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 27.33%. This indicates that WGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGS | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.71% | 27.33% | -4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.16% | 66.16% | +20.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.76% | 82.61% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.07% | 66.18% | +43.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.32% | 69.80% | +37.52% |
Dividends
WGS vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
Neither WGS nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
WGS vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WGS vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison
WGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 68.21M and revenue of 102.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.7%.
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
WGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -57.47M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.2%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
WGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -63.32M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in a net margin of -61.9%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WGS and ASM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (27.33%) compared to WGS (22.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGS and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer