WBS vs. CFG
WBS (Webster Financial Corporation) and CFG (Citizens Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, WBS returned 9.84%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for CFG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
WBS vs. CFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBS achieves a 15.88% return, which is significantly higher than CFG's 6.84% return. Over the past 10 years, WBS has underperformed CFG with an annualized return of 9.84%, while CFG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.47% annualized return.
WBS
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 42.10%
- 3Y*
- 27.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
CFG
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 55.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.47%
WBS vs. CFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBS Webster Financial Corporation | 15.88% | 17.31% | 12.48% | 11.48% | -12.51% | 36.63% | -16.87% | 11.54% | -10.38% | 5.51% |
CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 6.84% | 38.60% | 38.01% | -11.01% | -13.37% | 37.02% | -6.73% | 41.84% | -27.44% | 19.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBS and CFG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2014 | 0.78 |
The correlation between WBS and CFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
WBS:
$11.53B
CFG:
$26.45B
WBS:
$6.28
CFG:
$4.55
WBS:
11.49
CFG:
13.53
WBS:
2.70
CFG:
2.37
WBS:
1.24
CFG:
1.10
WBS:
$4.35B
CFG:
$11.28B
WBS:
$2.06B
CFG:
$8.02B
WBS:
$1.07B
CFG:
$2.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBS vs. CFG — Risk / Return Rank
WBS
CFG
WBS vs. CFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBS | CFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.05 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 9.42 | -1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBS | CFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.14 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.26 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.34 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
WBS vs. CFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBS drawdown since its inception was -93.72%, which is greater than CFG's maximum drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBS and CFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBS | CFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.72% | -65.60% | -28.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.02% | -18.32% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.08% | -29.08% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.90% | -56.19% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.99% | -65.60% | -6.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -9.02% | +7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -17.95% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 5.92% | -0.83% |
Volatility
WBS vs. CFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) is 3.93%, while Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that WBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBS | CFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 7.07% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.53% | 18.95% | -3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.64% | 26.11% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.37% | 34.02% | +2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.79% | 38.19% | +1.60% |
Dividends
WBS vs. CFG - Dividend Comparison
WBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than CFG's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 2.93% | 2.94% | 3.84% | 5.07% | 4.11% | 3.30% | 4.36% | 3.35% | 3.30% | 1.52% | 1.29% | 1.53% |
WBS Webster Financial Corporation | 2.22% | 2.54% | 2.90% | 3.15% | 3.38% | 2.87% | 3.80% | 2.87% | 2.54% | 1.83% | 1.81% | 2.39% |
Financials
WBS vs. CFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Webster Financial Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WBS vs. CFG - Profitability Comparison
WBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Webster Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 994.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.
WBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Webster Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 994.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 650.00M and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.
WBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Webster Financial Corporation reported a net income of 246.23M and revenue of 994.28M, resulting in a net margin of 24.8%.
CFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 517.00M and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WBS and CFG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to WBS (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBS dropped -93.72% vs CFG's -65.60%.
CFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WBS and CFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer